From Breach to Courtroom: Inside the MOVEit Exploitation and Mass Litigation
By Ramyar Daneshgar
Security Engineer | USC Viterbi School of Engineering
Looking for a security engineer? Visit SecurityEngineer.com
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Executive Summary
This report analyzes the MOVEit Transfer breach, including its technical origin, legal consequences, and contractual failures. It offers concrete guidance for cybersecurity, legal, and compliance teams to implement contractual protections establish vendor accountability, and operationalize risk transfer in thrid party software agreements.
1. Technical Summary: MOVEit Exploit Overview
The MOVEit Transfer software vulnerability (CVE-2023-34362) allowed unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection and upload webshells for persistent access. The CL0P ransomware group exploited this flaw to exfiltrate sensitive data across multiple sectors, including government contractors, financial services, and educational institutions.
Technical Breakdown
- Vulnerability Type: SQL injection
- Execution: Remote code execution through unauthenticated webshell upload
- CVE ID: CVE-2023-34362
- Exploiting Actor: CL0P ransomware group
- Data Types Exfiltrated: National ID numbers, payroll files, healthcare records, financial statements
- Impact: Over 2,500 organizations affected, with multiple jurisdictional data transfers and legal exposure
2. Core Contractual Gaps
A significant number of affected organizations operated without contractually defined obligations for vulnerability disclosure, breach notification, incident response coordination, or liability allocation. The absence of these provisions limited their ability to contain the breach, fulfill regulatory requirements, and shift risk to the responsible vendor.
| Clause Omitted or Insufficient | Impact |
|---|---|
| Vulnerability notification obligation | No requirement to notify licensee of security flaws, delaying response |
| SLA for security patch delivery | No deadline to remediate confirmed vulnerabilities |
| Breach response support clause | No vendor duty to provide logs, technical assistance, or impact scoping |
| Breach-related indemnity | No obligation to reimburse for regulatory fines, legal defense, or notification expenses |
| Carve-out from liability limitation | Vendors shielded by broad liability disclaimers—even in case of known configuration failures |
3. Legal and Regulatory Fallout
Litigation Overview
- More than 70 class action lawsuits filed in the U.S.
- Claims brought against: Progress Software, enterprise users of MOVEit, and managed service providers
Common Legal Allegations
- Negligence (failure to maintain reasonable data protection controls)
- Breach of implied contract
- Violations of data protection laws (CCPA, CPRA, GLBA)
- Unjust enrichment and misrepresentation of security practices
Regulatory Enforcement Activity
| Agency | Action Taken |
|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | HIPAA enforcement initiated against healthcare licensees |
| State Attorneys General | Civil investigative demands and consumer protection inquiries |
| EU Data Protection Authorities | Investigations launched into cross-border data exposures |
4. Recommended Contract Language and Operational Controls
4. Recommended Contract Language and Operational Controls
This section outlines enforceable contract clauses and operational practices organizations should implement to reduce exposure associated with third-party software. Each clause is paired with an explanation to clarify its risk mitigation purpose.
A. Core Security Obligations in Licensing Agreements
These clauses ensure that vendors are contractually obligated to disclose vulnerabilities, apply timely remediation, and deliver secure software configurations by default.
1. Vulnerability Disclosure Obligation
Vendor shall notify Licensee in writing of any material security vulnerability within 48 hours of internal discovery, including description, affected systems, and planned mitigation timeline.
Without a disclosure requirement, vendors may withhold critical security information. This clause mandates timely notice so customers can assess and mitigate downstream risk.
2. Defined Patch Timeline
Vendor shall deliver security patches or mitigations for all confirmed High or Critical vulnerabilities within five business days of discovery.
Rationale: This clause establishes a clear SLA for remediation. Without it, organizations cannot compel timely action or hold vendors accountable for delay.
3. Incident Response Support
In the event of a security incident involving Vendor Software, Vendor shall provide access to relevant forensic logs, technical contacts, and investigation findings upon request.
Rationale: Enables effective triage and containment by requiring vendors to participate in incident response. Critical for breach reporting and root cause analysis.
4. Secure-by-Default Software Delivery
Software must ship with authentication, TLS, access logging, and role-based access controls enabled by default. Insecure defaults must be disclosed in writing.
Rationale: This clause eliminates silent misconfigurations. Enforcing secure defaults at delivery ensures baseline protection even before customization or hardening.
B. Liability Allocation and Indemnification
These provisions ensure vendors bear appropriate responsibility for defects, security failures, and regulatory exposure stemming from their software.
1. Breach Cost Indemnity
Vendor shall indemnify Licensee for reasonable costs related to breach events arising from software defects, including legal fees, regulator fines, notification costs, and third-party claims.
Rationale: Provides financial recovery for licensees in the event of a vendor-originated breach. Ensures that vendors cannot externalize their risk through design negligence.
2. Liability Limitation Exception
Vendor’s limitation of liability shall not apply to security incidents resulting from known unremediated vulnerabilities or negligent product design.
Rationale: Prevents vendors from invoking liability caps in cases where they failed to address known security issues or deployed unsafe configurations.
3. Security Assurance Warranty
Vendor represents and warrants that, to the best of its knowledge, software is free from known unresolved security defects rated High or Critical.
Rationale: Creates a baseline for product assurance. This clause enables enforcement if software is delivered with material security defects the vendor failed to disclose.
C. Vendor Evaluation and Contract Review Controls
These controls establish structured oversight during procurement and contracting to ensure software agreements contain necessary risk and compliance provisions.
- Conduct mandatory legal, cybersecurity, and privacy review of all third-party software agreements prior to approval.
- Maintain an auditable vendor inventory with contract-specific metadata, including notification SLAs, patch obligations, indemnity language, and regulatory contact information.
- Schedule periodic tabletop exercises simulating third-party compromise scenarios, with vendor communication roles, breach escalation procedures, and notification decision-making clearly defined.
D. Data Protection and Regulatory Compliance Provisions
These provisions ensure vendors support the licensee’s obligations under applicable privacy and breach notification laws.
1. Breach Notification Timing
Vendor shall notify Licensee of any confirmed or reasonably suspected data compromise within the timeframes required under applicable laws.
Enables Licensees to meet statutory and contractual reporting obligations and reduces regulatory risk.
2. Regulator Support Obligation
Vendor agrees to provide documentation, system logs, data flow diagrams, and access to personnel to support regulator inquiries or audits related to vendor software.
Ensures vendors assist during investigations, supporting accountability and documentation requirements.
3. Data Processing Agreement Requirement
Vendor shall execute a data processing agreement that defines the roles and responsibilities of each party and includes jurisdiction-specific privacy terms.
Defines the legal roles and required safeguards necessary to meet statutory obligations under data protection frameworks including GDPR, CPRA, and HIPAA
Conclusion
The MOVEit breach illustrates how vague or missing contract terms can shift full liability to licensees, even when technical fault lies upstream. Without enforceable security warranties, breach support clauses, and defined notification procedures, organizations are left without leverage in crisis scenarios.
Organizations can reduce software supply chain exposure by:
- Embedding specific and time-bound contractual obligations for security
- Requiring post-incident support and regulator-facing cooperation from vendors
- Defining indemnity and liability terms that reflect real-world breach impact
Clear contract terms translate technical risk into legally manageable obligations.
Looking for a security engineer? Visit SecurityEngineer.com
Need a Cybersecurity Attorney?
Get top legal guidance in breach response, data privacy, and cybersecurity compliance. Connect with attorneys who know how to defend against audits, investigations, and liability.
👉 Hire a Cybersecurity Attorney